United States v. Urdiera
United States v. Urdiera
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 17, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 03-40340 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLETO ANTUNEZ URDIERA, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-551-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Cleto Antunez Urdiera has moved for leave to withdraw from this direct appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California.1 Antunez Urdiera has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 386 U.S. 738 (1967). to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.2
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.