Maria Maldonado was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 after a border search revealed cocaine hidden on her person. Appealing her sentence, Maldonado argues that the district court’s determination that her testimony was not credible, and hence that she did not merit relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, was not supported by evidence in the record. Because the distriet court identified several specific suspicious elements of Maldonado’s account that she was not able to satisfactorily render clear, the district court’s factual finding that Maldonado had not been sufficiently truthful “is plausible in light of the record as a whole”. See United States v. Edwards, 65 F.3d 430, 432 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Flanagan, 80 F.3d 143, 145 (5th Cir. 1996). The ruling of the district court is AFFIRMED.