United States v. Rodriguez
United States v. Rodriguez
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40822 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HERBERT RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-1772-ALL --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Herbert Rodriguez appeals his guilty plea conviction and
sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation
of
8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated
felony” provisions of
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in
light of Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466(2000). Rodriguez
concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.
United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235, 239-47(1998). Apprendi did
not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-40822 -2-
489-90; United States v. Dabeit,
231 F.3d 979, 984(5th Cir.
2000). Therefore, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished