Michael Dean Lang appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of stolen firearms. Lang argues that the district court should not have increased his offense level by four levels under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) because it already had increased his offense level by two levels under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4). Lang concedes that in United States v. Luna, 165 F.3d 316 (5th Cir. 1999), this court rejected the argument that he advances, but he notes that other circuits have held otherwise. He thus seeks to preserve the argument for Supreme Court review.

This court reviews the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo. Luna, 165 F.3d at 322. However, “it is the firm rule of this circuit that one panel may not overrule the decisions of another.” United States v. Taylor, 933 F.2d 307, 313 (5th Cir. 1991). In Luna, 165 F.3d at 323, this court held that the firearms Guidelines permit separate enhancements for the firearms being stolen, under § 2K2.1(b)(4), and for the same firearms being possessed during the commission of the underlying felony offense of burglary, under § 2K2.1(b)(5). Because Lang’s argument is directly foreclosed by the precedent of this court, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.