Raul Sotelo-Lopez appeals from the district court’s denial of his pro se “Motion to Modify Sentence.” In that motion, SoteloLopez alleged that the Government had breached a post-sentencing agreement and asked the district court to award him specific performance by ordering the Government to file a motion for an additional downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. The district court denied SoteloLopez’s motion on the ground that the relief requested was not permitted under Fed. R.Crim. P. 35(c) (2002).

On appeal, Sotelo-Lopez argues that the district court should have granted his motion pursuant to Fed. R.Crim. P. 35(b) (2002) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B). Neither of those cited authorities permits the relief requested in Sotelo-Lopez’s motion. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Sotelo-Lopez’s “Motion to Modify Sentence” is AFFIRMED.