United States v. Ledesma
United States v. Ledesma
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20123 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL ROJAS LEDESMA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-392-1 -------------------- December 19, 2002
Before DAVIS, WIENER, AND EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Cheryl Harris Diggs, the attorney appointed to represent
Manuel Rojas Ledesma, has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738(1967). Ledesma has filed a response to Diggs’ brief, and he
also moves this court for the appointment of new counsel. Our
independent review of the record, Diggs’ brief, and Ledesma’s
response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-20123 -2-
Accordingly, Ledesma’s motion for the appointment of new counsel
is DENIED, Diggs’ motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Diggs
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished