Maria Luz Mata-Arzola (Mata) petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) denial of her request for cancellation of removal. She argues that the BIA erred when it determined that her continuous physical presence in the United States terminated in February 1993 when she departed the United States under threat of institution of removal proceedings.

This court has jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order denying cancellation of removal. See Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft, 349 F.3d 213, 217 (5th Cir. 2003). To be eligible for a discretionary cancellation of removal, an alien must satisfy four requirements, one of which is 10 years of continuous physical presence in the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Mireles-Valdez, 349 F.3d at 214-15. The Attorney General has determined that voluntary departure under the threat of removal proceedings interrupts continuous presence. See Mireles-Valdez, 349 F.3d *82 at 218. This court has upheld the Attorney General’s determination. See id.

PETITION DENIED.