Court-appointed counsel for Jose Cruz Diaz-Camarillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). DiazCamarillo has filed a response in which he raises several claims, including claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The record has not been adequately developed for us to consider in this direct appeal the ineffective assistance claims raised by Diaz-Camarillo. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987); see United States v. Price, 95 F.3d 364, 369 (5th Cir. 1996).

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Diaz-Camarillo’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.