Paul Terrell Thomas, federal prisoner No. 97156-079, has appealed the district court’s denial of his motion for permission to file an out-of-time appeal from the denial of a motion for Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) relief from his criminal conviction. Rule 60(b) does not provide a basis for relief from judgment in a criminal case. United States v. O’Keefe, 169 F.3d 281, 289 (5th Cir. 1999). Thomas’s motion did not sound as a collateral challenge to his conviction or seek post-conviction relief by any of the avenues authorized by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Castro v. United States, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. *806 786, 789, 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003); Fed. R.Crim. P. 33-36. As the motion was unauthorized and without a jurisdictional basis, Thomas has appealed from the denial of a meaningless motion. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994).

Thomas’s appeal is without arguable merit. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Thomas is warned that should he accumulate three strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C.1915(g), he will be unable to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.