Goss v. Johnson
Goss v. Johnson
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 96-40548 Summary Calendar _______________________
REGINALD R. GOSS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS,
Respondents-Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (C-95-CV-556) _________________________________________________________________
February 24, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Reginald R. Goss, Texas prisoner #684326, appeals the
district court’s dismissal of the
28 U.S.C. § 2254petition for
failure to exhaust his state remedies. Goss is now required to
obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) in order to appeal the
district court’s order. We will not issue a COA, however, as Goss
has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. constitutional right. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see also
Drinkard v. Johnson,
97 F.3d 751, 756(5th Cir. 1996). In the
alternative, if the district court was authorized to issue COA, we
conclude that because the state record indicates that Goss failed
to present his claim that the prosecution withheld exculpatory
evidence to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district court
did not err in dismissing Goss’ § 2254 petition for failure to
exhaust his state remedies. See Dispensa v. Lynaugh.
847 F.2d 211, 217-18(5th Cir. 1988).
For the foregoing reasons, COA is DENIED; and the
judgment is AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished