Kirschbaum v. Perry
Kirschbaum v. Perry
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 96-50082 Summary Calendar _____________________
MARY LOU KIRSCHBAUM,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. PERRY, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, and his successors in Office; WILLIAM REED, Director, U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency, and his successors in Office; JOHN McINTOSH, Manager, Austin Branch, U. S. Defense Contract Audit Agency, and his successors in Office,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (A-95-CV-269) _________________________________________________________________ July 24, 1996
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mary Lou Kirschbaum appeals the dismissal, for failure to
prosecute, of her employment discrimination claim. However, she
contends only that the district court abused its discretion by
denying her FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion for reinstatement (filed
more than 10 days after entry of the order of dismissal).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. Kirschbaum filed a timely notice of appeal from the order of
dismissal, but did not file a notice of appeal from the order
denying her 60(b) motion. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to
consider the denial of that motion. See, e.g., Williams v. Chater,
___ F.3d ___, ___,
1996 WL 361223(5th Cir. 1996). Although the
appeal from the order of dismissal is properly before us,
Kirschbaum has not presented a basis for reversal.
Id.Therefore, the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished