IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 96-50103 Summary Calendar _____________________

ELMO HAROLD LIESMANN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BOB OWENS, Director; TAMMY McINOCH, Parole Officer, Dallas County, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-396 _________________________________________________________________ July 9, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elmo Harold Liesmann, Texas prisoner #390085, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).

Liesmann contends that the requirements of Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S.Ct. 2364 (1994), do not apply to his claims against the defendants. We do not agree. See Jackson v. Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175, * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

177 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 148 (1995). We have reviewed the record and Liesmann’s brief and AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal for essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court. Liesmann v. Owens, No. A-95-CV-396 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 2, 1996).

A F F I R M E D.

-2-