United States v. Bratcher
United States v. Bratcher
Opinion
Chyann Fine Bratcher, federal prisoner # 27051-077, has appealed the district court’s order denying her motion for ap *553 pointment of counsel. Bratcher contends that she is entitled to appointed counsel under 21 U.S.C. § 848(q)(4)(A) & (8) because she is a “capital” defendant. Because Bratcher was not sentenced to death, she is not awaiting execution of a “judgment imposing a sentence of death.” Accordingly, she is not entitled to appointment of counsel under the plain language of 21 U.S.C. § 848(q)(4)(A) & (8). The appeal is dismissed as frivolous. We caution Bratcher that the filing of frivolous motions and appeals in the future will invite the imposition of a sanction.
APPEAL DISMISSED WITH SANCTION WARNING.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *553 the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.