Jerry W. Hudgens appeals a judgement affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s determination that Hudgens is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Hudgens argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) applied the wrong legal standard and that the decision is contrary to the evidence. It is undisputed that Hudgens is currently disabled; however, his application for disability benefits was denied on the basis that he failed to establish that the disability existed on December 31, 1991, the date that his insured status under the Social Security Act expired.

The ALJ applied the correct legal standard, and substantial evidence from medical records compiled by Hudgens’ treating physician supports the ALJ’s finding that Hudgens was capable of at least light work on the date that his insured status expired. Ripley v. Chater, 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir. 1995); Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 237 (5th Cir. 1994). The decision of the district court affirming the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.