David Brian Pugh pleaded guilty to one conspiracy charge and one fraud charge. The district court upwardly departed at sentencing and sentenced Pugh to 96 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Pugh now appeals his sentence, arguing only that the extent of the district court’s departure was unreasonable. Because Pugh challenges only the extent of the district court’s departure, we need not analyze the recent changes to review of upward departures set out in amended 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e). See United States v. Lee, 358 F.3d 315, 326-29 (5th Cir. 2004). Rather, we need only consider whether the extent of the departure was reasonable. See Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193, 203, 112 S.Ct. 1112, 117 L.Ed.2d 341 (1992); United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

A review of this court’s jurisprudence controverts Pugh’s arguments and shows that the extent of the district court’s departure, although substantial, was not unreasonable. See United States v. Daughenbaugh, 49 F.3d 171, 173-74 (5th Cir. 1995); Ashburn, 38 F.3d at 806; United States v. Rosogie, 21 F.3d 632, 633 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, there is no abuse of discretion, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.