Samuel D. Bencosme entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute the same. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress all physical, documentary, and other evidence that was seized after he consented to have his car searched following a traffic stop. Bencosme fails to show that the district court’s finding that Bencosme voluntarily consented to the search of his automobile was clearly erroneous. See United, States v. Mendozar-Gonzalez, 318 F.3d 663, 666 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Zueco, 71 F.3d 188,191 (5th Cir. 1995).

The district court’s denial of Bencosme’s motion to suppress evidence is AFFIRMED.