United States v. Ramirez-Tercero
United States v. Ramirez-Tercero
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 8, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51160 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GABRIEL RAMIREZ-TERCERO, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-02-CR-122-2 -------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Gabriel Ramirez-Tercero has moved for leave to withdraw from this direct appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Ramirez has responded after receiving a copy of counsel’s motion and brief. He has not raised any appellate claims, but seeks appointment of new counsel to continue his case.
Ramirez’s motion for new counsel is DENIED. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-51160 -2- withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.