Jose Natividad Fernandez, Jr., appeals from his conviction and sentence following a bench trial on stipulated facts for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1), 846; 18 U.S.C. § 2. Fernandez argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of marijuana seized during a warrantless search. Even if Fernandez had an expectation of privacy in the garage and storage area searched, the district court’s determination, that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless search, is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Vasquez, 953 F.2d 176, 179 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Rico, 51 F.3d 495, 501 (5th Cir. 1995). Moreover, the entry into the garage and storage area was permissible as a protective sweep incident to Fernandez’s arrest. See Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 327, 110 S.Ct. 1093, 108 L.Ed.2d 276 (1990); United States v. Watson, 273 F.3d 599, 603 (5th Cir. 2001).

Fernandez challenges the district court’s refusal to award him a two-level decrease in his offense level pursuant to the safety-valve provision, U.S.S.G. §§ 2D1.1(b)(6) and 5C1.2(a)(5). The district court did not err in determining that Fernandez was not entitled to a safety-valve reduction. See United States v. Flanagan, 80 F.3d 143, 145-47 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.