Private counsel appointed to represent Willard Barry Lively has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lively has filed a response to counsel’s motion. Lively’s claims alleging ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel are not cognizable in the instant appeal. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987).

*432 Our independent review of the brief, response, suppression hearing, jury trial, sentencing, and record discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Lively’s motion to allow counsel to withdraw is DENIED as moot.

COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; LIVELY’S MOTION TO ALLOW COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.