In this expedited appeal, Charles Cleveland Nowden challenges the district court’s decision to revoke his supervised release. Nowden argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he violated the terms of supervised release. He challenges the credibility determinations made by the district court.

This court will not disturb the district court’s credibility determinations on appeal. See United States v. Alaniz-Alaniz, 38 F.3d 788, 790 (5th Cir. 1994). The testimony offered by the probation officer was sufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Nowden violated the terms of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. McCormick, 54 F.3d 214, 219 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.