Verona L. Johnson appeals her resen-tencing for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Johnson argues that she *435 should not have received a two-level increase in her offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines for obstruction of justice.

The district court’s factual finding of obstruction of justice is plausible in light of the record as a whole. Therefore, the obstruction finding was not clearly erroneous. See U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1; United States v. Johnson, 352 F.3d 146, 147-48 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Storm, 36 F.3d 1289, 1295 (5th Cir. 1994).

Johnson has filed a letter pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 28(j) calling our attention to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). However, we have held that Blakely does not apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465 (5th Cir. 2004).

AFFIRMED.