Nader v. Connor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Nader v. Connor, 388 F.3d 137 (5th Cir. 2004)
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20841; 2004 WL 2239033

Nader v. Connor

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-Appellants Ralph Nader, et al., appeal from the district court’s decision denying their First and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional challenges to the Texas Election Code, specifically sections 192.32(a), 192.32(b)(3)(A), 192.32(c), and 192.32(d). Essentially for the reasons as well stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion, Nader v. Connor, 332 F.Supp.2d 982 (W.D.Tex. 2004), we AFFIRM that court’s final judgment declar *138 ing the challenged Texas Election Code provisions legal and constitutional.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ralph NADER, Candidate for President of the United States; Stephen E. Smaha; Suzanne Russo; And Lucretia Krause, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Geoffrey S. CONNOR, Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Defendant-Appellee
Cited By
10 cases
Status
Published