Gerardo Jose Gutierrez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for receiving and distributing child pornography. He argues that the district court plainly erred by imposing a special condition of supervised release that prohibits him from possessing or accessing a computer or computer network outside of that specifically required for work or *408 school, and by prohibiting him from accessing or using the Internet.

Gutierrez has not shown that the district court plainly erred by imposing such a condition. See United States v. Paul, 274 F.3d 155, 170 (5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.