United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the October 14, 2004 United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III for the Fifth Circuit Clerk _______________

m 03-60884 _______________

DERIC HEARN; ALVALINE BAGGETT; CHARLES BANKS; JERRY BRISTER; TOMMIE L. BROWN; JANE DOES 1-50; JOHN DOES; ET AL.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi m 3-99-CV-359-LN _________________________

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, issued a comprehensive opinion, entered Circuit Judges. August 12, 2003, dismissing the complaint.

PER CURIAM:* We have reviewed the briefs and applicable portions of the record and have consulted the The plaintiffs bring a title VII action for relevant caselaw. Concluding that the district disparate treatment and disparate impact. court committed no reversible error, we af- Following a bench trial, the district court firm, essentially for the reasons given by the district court in its impressive opinion.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has de- termined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.