Cleveland Golden appeals the 120-month sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to one count of armed bank robbery and to one count of carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. Golden argues that the district court made a mistake when it used a total offense level 26 after granting the Government’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Fed. R.CrimP. 35(b).

Because the district court could on remand impose the same 120-month sentence under a reasonable application of the Guidelines, and because such a sentence would be in compliance with the terms of the plea agreement, Golden fails to meet his burden of showing that the district court’s mistake constituted plain error. See United States v. Wheeler, 322 F.3d 823, 827-28 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc)(citing United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993)).

AFFIRMED.