Carlos Cesar Vidal-Bouche appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry, specifically the determination that his Texas conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (UUMV) constituted an aggravated felony for purposes of an eight-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) (2000). We affirm.

Vidal’s argument that Texas’s UUMV offense does not constitute a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) is foreclosed by United States v. Galvan-Rodriguez, 169 F.3d 217, 219 (5th Cir. 1999). Similarly, his contention that the Constitution prohibits the process by which an Article III judge applies the U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) enhancement is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263). We are bound by our precedent absent an intervening Supreme Court decision or a subsequent en banc decision. See United States v. Short, 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.