Pierce v. United Rentals, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit November 3, 2004

Pierce v. United Rentals, Inc., 111 F. App'x 763 (5th Cir. 2004)

Opinion

PER CURIAM: **

The court has considered the parties’ positions in light of oral argument, the briefs, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, the court finds no reversible error of fact or law and AFFIRMS for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. See Pierce v. United Rentals, Inc., No. 3:01-CV-0995-K, 2003 WL 22289882 (N.D.Tex. Aug.28, 2003).

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name: Michael Jon PIERCE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED RENTALS, INC., United Rentals Occupational Injury Benefit Plan and Employers Health Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees
Status: Unpublished