Hong v. Ashcroft
Hong v. Ashcroft
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 15, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 03-60688
SHI PING HONG,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
Petitions for Review from an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA No.A77-775-238) _______________________________________________________
Before REAVLEY, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The petitioner failed to prove that he is eligible for asylum. The Immigration
Judge found no credible evidence that the petitioner suffered past persecution under
China’s one-child policy. PETITION DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished