We affirm the judgment for the following reasons:

1. The district court’s grant of summary judgment did not deny Dora-mus due process. Oglesby v. Terminal Transport Co., 543 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1976).

2. Doramus has not presented a triable issue on her claims regarding violations of zoning laws and restrictive covenants, because her lack of standing to pursue those claims has been preclusively determined in a previous suit. See Winters v. Diamond Shamrock Chem. Co., 149 F.3d 387, 391 (5th Cir. 1998).

3. Doramus has not made any showing that defendants made a false statement to her with knowledge of the statement’s falsity or ignorance of its truth, and thus has not presented a triable claim of fraud under Mississippi law. See Gamble v. Dollar Gen. Corp., 852 So.2d 5, 10 (Miss. 2003).

AFFIRMED.