Maresh v. Thompson
Maresh v. Thompson
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 30, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-11214
JOHANNA MARESH, as Next Friend of Regina Maresh Plaintiff-Appellant v. TOMMY G THOMPSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas No. 3:03-CV-1018-H
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Johanna Maresh appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court concluded that Maresh failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. See Maresh ex rel Maresh v. Thompson, 290 F. Supp. 2d 737, 737-39 (N.D. Tex. 2003). Having reviewed the record and fully considered the parties’ arguments,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
-1- we agree with the Secretary that Maresh’s challenge to the Secretary’s overpayment determination must be presented administratively before it is reviewed in the district court.
Since Maresh filed her district court suit before exhausting her administrative remedies, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over her case. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment for essentially the same reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion and Order.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.