Ndue Sokoli appeals his conviction of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana in violation of U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(A)(vii). Sokoli appeals on three grounds: (1) that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain his conviction; (2) that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting a co-conspirator’s testimony; and (3) that the district court abused its discretion in its response to a jury inquiry. Having fully considered the arguments of counsel as advanced in briefs and oral argument, and having carefully reviewed the record on appeal, we find that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury conviction, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the co-conspirator’s testimony or responding to the jury’s inquiry.

The judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.