Gabriel Loredo-Pecina pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry into the United States, and the district court sentenced him to 15 months of imprisonment and a three-year term of supervised release. *238 Loredo contends that the district court erred by characterizing his state felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an “aggravated felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C). This issue, however, is foreclosed by our precedent. See United States v. Caicedo-Cuero, 312 F.3d 697, 706-11 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1997).

Loredo contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As Loredo concedes, this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). See United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.