The district court’s conclusions that the employment of plaintiff Randy Balderas was terminated by defendant Sheriff Tommy Williams and that Balderas’s obligation to perform service in a uniformed service was a motivating factor in that termination are not clearly erroneous. Further, the district court did not err in finding that Balderas adequately mitigated damages. Finally, the district court did not err in concluding that the defendants failure to comply with the provisions of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., was not willful. Although the defendants took the tack that Balderas was not terminated, the record reflects that reasons in addition to his service in a uniformed service entered into the decision to terminate Balderas, and the district court could properly take those reasons into consideration when deciding whether the defendants acted willfully. The defendants other arguments on appeal are meritless.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.