United States v. Vizcaino-Amaro
United States v. Vizcaino-Amaro
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50808 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CESAR VIZCAINO-AMARO, also known as Ricardo Vizcaino,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-164-ALL-PRM --------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cesar Vizcaino-
Amaro raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres
v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235(1998), which held that a
prior conviction is a sentencing factor under
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense, and by United
States v. Pineiro,
377 F.3d 464, 465-66(5th Cir. 2004), petition
for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held
that Blakely v. Washington,
124 S. Ct. 2531(2004), does not
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-50808 -2-
apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished