Martinez v. Barnhart

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Martinez v. Barnhart, 115 F. App'x 762 (5th Cir. 2004)

Martinez v. Barnhart

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The ALJ’s decisions was supported by substantial evidence, and the ALJ used the proper legal standards to evaluate the evidence. See Brown v. Apfel, 192 F.3d 492, 496 (5th Cir. 1999). The objective medical evidence supports the ALJ’s determination that Martinez is capable of performing light work. Further, Martinez’s condition does not wax and wane to the extent that a separate capable-of-maintaining-employment finding was necessary in this case. *763 See Frank v. Barnhart, 326 F.3d 618 (5th Cir. 2003). AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
Simon MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished