U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Solis Cortez

United States v. Solis Cortez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 18, 2004 · Garza, Higginbotham, Prado
88 F. App'x 772

United States v. Solis Cortez

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Adrian Solis Cortez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cortez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

The case is remanded for the purpose of correcting a clerical error in the judgment. See Fed. R.Crim. P. 36. The amended judgment should correct the term of supervised release to conform to the four-year term of supervised release imposed at sentencing.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.