The court has carefully considered this case in light of the briefs, oral argument and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law. Although the inferential evidence of racial discrimination in regard to Erby’s failure to promote claim was weak, it was not so nonexistent as to require taking the claim away from the jury. No doubt their view of this claim was also colored by the more compelling evidence on the retaliation claim. We find no reversible error in the court’s remitted award of damages or in its decision to deny a new trial.

AFFIRMED.