U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2004

McClain v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 31, 2004 · Garza, King, Smith

108 F. App'x 176

Counsel

Timothy Borne Garrigan, Stuckey, Garrigan & Castetter, Nacogdoches, TX, Teresa F. Demchak, Morris J. Bailer, Saperstein, Goldstein, Demchak & Bailer, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Douglas E. Hamel, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee., Mimi C. Satter, Satter & Andrews, Syracuse, NY, James Roddy Tanner, Rod Tanner & Associates, Fort Worth, TX, Joseph Donald Carona, Jr., Dies, Dies & Henderson, Orange, TX, for Movant-Appellant.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:*

The union appeals the denial of its motion to intervene. We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the oral arguments of counsel. Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.