We affirm the decision of the district court for the following reasons:

1. Substantial evidence in the record supports the Commissioner’s conclusion that Johnson’s condition does not meet a listed impairment, including Listing 1.05(C). Leggett v. Chater, 67 F.3d 558, 564 (5th Cir. 1995). Johnson has not shown that his condition satisfies each medical criterion of Listing 1.05(C). Sullivan v. Zebley, 493 U.S. 521, 530, 110 S.Ct. 885, 107 L.Ed.2d 967 (1990).

2. Substantial evidence in the record supports the Commissioner’s assessment of Johnson’s residual functional capacity. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a)(1) (2005); Leggett, 67 F.3d at 564 (5th Cir. 1995). Substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s conclusion that Johnson’s subjective complaints regarding the severity of his pain and his need to lie down for several hours a day were not entirely credible. Carrier v. Sullivan, 944 F.2d 243, 247-48 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.