Iban Paramero-Torres has filed a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order, denying him withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Because the BIA did not adopt the immigration judge’s decision, but issued its own decision, this court reviews the decision of the BIA. See Girma v. INS, 283 F.3d 664, 666 (5th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, Paramero’s arguments that the immigration judge erred in its adverse credibility determination and erred in failing to address his entitlement to relief under the CAT are not subject to review by this court. Id.

Paramero argues that he was eligible for withholding of removal because he demonstrated that he was persecuted and fears persecution by guerillas in Columbia on account of his religious beliefs and practices. To be eligible for withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act, an alien must demonstrate a clear probability of persecution upon return. Roy v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 132, 138 (5th Cir. 2004). The BIA’s decision that Paramero had failed to demonstrate clear probability of persecution is supported by substantial evidence. Zamora-Morel v. INS, 905 F.2d 833, 838 (5th Cir. 1990). The petition for review is DENIED.