Octavio Withron-Alvarez appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. Withron-Alvarez contends that the sentencing enhancements in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional and that he should be re-sentenced for the lesser included offense contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Withron-Alvarez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed under Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). However, he contends that if Almendarez-Torres is overruled, his sentence should be reconsidered in light of Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi 530 U.S. at 489-90, 120 S.Ct. 2348; see also United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Withron-Alvarez has not demonstrated that Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) is applicable to *585 cases arising under Almendarez-Torres. The sentence imposed is AFFIRMED.