Karen Dawn Droulia appeals the district court’s pretrial detention order. The district court’s decision rests upon its conclusion that Droulia has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure her appearance as required. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). The district court’s conclusion is supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly the district court’s order is AFFIRMED. Droulia’s motion for an expedited hearing is DENIED AS MOOT.