Gabriel Vasquez appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order. Vasquez has filed a motion contained in his brief for permission to supplement the record. This motion is DENIED as unnecessary.

The district court’s decision, which effectively adopted the reasoning of the magistrate judge, rests upon its conclusion that Vasquez has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community and that Vasquez poses a flight risk should he be released on bond. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). The district court’s conclusions are supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.