Marcos Gallegos-Garcia (“Gallegos”) has moved to withdraw certain appellate issues *778 from his brief. The motion is GRANTED. Gallegos pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States following deportation and was sentenced to a 36-month term of imprisonment. He argues that his sentence is unconstitutional because it was enhanced for a prior felony conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). Gallegos concedes that his argument is foreclosed by this court’s precedent, but he raises the issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review.

We reject Gallegos’s challenge to the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489-90, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” United States v. Mancia-Perez, 331 F.3d 464, 470 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 935, 124 S.Ct. 358, 157 L.Ed.2d 245 (2003).

MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPELLATE ISSUES GRANTED; AFFIRMED.