Minerva Delgado-Castañeda petitions this court for review of the Board of Im *675 migration Appeals’s (BIA’s) denial of cancellation of removal. Delgado-Castañeda argues that the BIA erred when it determined that her 1993 voluntary departure from this country following a visit to Mexico interrupted her ten years continuous physical presence in the United States.

The Respondent has filed a motion for a summary disposition.

This court has jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order. See Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft, 349 F.3d 213, 217 (5th Cir. 2003). To be eligible for a discretionary cancellation of removal, an alien must satisfy four requirements, one of which is 10 years of continuous physical presence in the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Mireles-Valdez, 349 F.3d at 214-15. Delgado’s voluntary departure from the United States at the border in 1993 interrupted her continuous presence. See MirelesValdez, 349 F.3d at 217-19.

The Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the petition for review is DENIED.