United States v. Perry
United States v. Perry
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 27, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11287 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT CECIL PERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CR-241-5 -------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Robert Cecil Perry has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Perry has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in Perry’s appeal from the revocation of his supervised release because Perry already has completely served his sentence. See United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999) (dismissal for mootness).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-11287 -2- Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.