In this appeal, the Government apparently concedes that Naranjo-Velasquez can satisfy the third prong of the plain error standard of review by showing that the district court felt constrained by the Sentencing Guidelines and most likely would have imposed a lower sentence under an advisory guidelines regime. We find nothing in the record that disturbs the Government’s representation. Accordingly, the sentence is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for resentencing in accordance with United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

VACATED and REMANDED.