United States v. Ochoa-Oropeza
United States v. Ochoa-Oropeza
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 28, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-51169 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANIEL OCHOA-OROPEZA, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-272-4 -------------------- Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Counsel for Daniel Ochoa-Oropeza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ochoa-Oropeza has not filed a response.
Our review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.