Appellants assign some twenty-three violations of the Texas Constitution and breaches of common law and statutory duties in support of their appeal challenging the district court’s order concluding that appellants are bound on the note and mortgage they signed and granting summary judgment to defendants. Having reviewed the briefs and record in this case, we conclude that none of these arguments have merit. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s Memorandum and Order of February 16, 2005.

AFFIRMED.