U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2005

Darden v. Barnhart

Darden v. Barnhart
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 21, 2005 · Reavley, Jolly, Higginbotham
139 F. App'x 624

Darden v. Barnhart

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The magistrate judge explained fully why the finding of the administrative law judge has to be upheld. Claimant now points to notes on the Dallas VA Medical Center assessment saying that he suffered from depression and post traumatic stress disorder, and he says that he is entitled to a further review to take that under consideration. This is said not to be a new development, and the mere notes would not warrant a decision that there is a reasonable possibility that the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration would determine the claimant’s disability differently. See Johnson v. Heckler, 767 F.2d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 1985).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.